Archive for the ‘College Admission’ Category

The South Rises Again

Sunday, July 15th, 2007

The Southern Regional Education Board, an education policy research organization, released its SREB Fact Book on Higher Education, a report on the state of higher education in the 16 states that make up the Southern region (see the states).

The reports revealed 6 major findings:
-Most of the U.S. population growth over the next 20 years will be in the South.
More than half of the United States’ population growth over the next 20 years will be in        the 16 SREB states.

-Hispanic students represent the lion’s share of projected population  growth
.
Hispanics will account for 28% of the region’s high school grads by 2018.  Black and Hispanic college enrollment levels are expected to increase to 44 percent by 2014 and to 48 percent by 2018.

-The percentage of Black college students finally exceeds the percentage of Blacks in the region’s population
Black undergraduate enrollment has risen 52 percent to 21% of total college student enrollment, while the Black population sits at roughly 19%.  Nationally, the percentage of Black college students lags behind their population percentage.

-College enrollment rates of Hispanic students lags behind that of Blacks and Whites.
Despite the increase in number of Hispanic students, the college-going rate of Hispanic 18- to 24-year-olds (25 percent) lagged behind the rates for black students (33 percent) and white students (43 percent) in the U.S. in 2005.

-Women and minorities lead growth in degrees.
Women and minorities accounted for most of the SREB region’s increases in degrees awarded from 1995 to 2005, representing 69 percent and 42 percent, respectively, of the total increase in bachelor’s degrees.

-Increased minority college enrollment may threaten gains in educational attainment.
If the educational attainment levels of Blacks and Hispanics do not improve, the increases in minority student enrollment (and the resulting increase in the number of students in the region from middle- and lower income families), the rising cost of college tuition and the increase in the number of jobs requiring bachelors degrees may converge to cause a reversal of educational progress in the region.  SREB predicts that “efforts to ensure that affordable college opportunities are available to all students will be increasingly important to the region’s and nation’s continued education progress”.

Other Interesting Findings
The majority of the Black student enrollment increases have occurred at public universities and two-year colleges, rather than at historically black institutions, which traditionally have educated the bulk of black students in the South.  Black enrollment in historically black institutions has slipped from 26 percent to 19 percent over the last decade.

Reaction to the SREB Findings
None of SREB’s findings should come as a big surprise given all of the debate over immigration, which has unfortunately focused almost solely on Hispanics, and the debate over the No Child Left Behind Act, our president’s attempt at improving the educational opportunities and outcomes of the nation’s poorest students.

Additionally, the fact that more minorities and women are earning degrees and becoming more affluent is also nothing new.

Finally, the Board’s finding that more Black students are enrolling in colleges in the South are not surprising given that Blacks are relocating back to the South in record numbers, citing reasons that include lower costs of living and being nearer to family members (especially post-911 and Katrina).

The fact that most of the new enrollment is not going to historically black colleges is also no surprising, and not indicative of any decline in their quality or attractiveness.  Instead, the numbers represent a move toward lower cost tuition.

Read SREB’s full report.

Game On At Community Colleges

Thursday, July 5th, 2007

Thousands of students enroll in community and junior colleges every year, generally as an alternative to higher priced private and public 4-year colleges.  In the past that meant foregoing the “college experience” complete with sports teams, dorm life, student government and  lots of school spirit in exchange for less stringent admissions requirements, low per-unit costs, flexible schedules and a shorter path to a degree (an associate’s degree).

Junior and community colleges still offer these great benefits, but, in response to the demands throngs of students ages 18-24, they are now attempting to provide a more authentic college experience by adding or expanding athletic programs.  Students–both those interested in playing sports and those who simply want to cheer them on–are responding by enrolling in greater numbers to those community and junior colleges that boast athletic teams.  And that’s just what the colleges’ presidents had in mind.

The National Junior College Athletics Association has reportedly added more than 40 colleges since 2003, ten of those in 2006 alone, bringing their total membership to 500 colleges.

Here’s a sampling of the new additions:

2006

  • Arkansas Baptist College (Little Rock, Ark.)
  • Berean Institute (Philadelphia)
  • Coastal Bend College (Beeville, Tex.)
  • Guilford Technical Community College (Jamestown, N.C.)
  • Jackson Community College (Jackson, Mich.)
  • Little Big Horn College (Crow Agency, Mont.)
  • Marion Military Institute (Marion, Ala.)
  • Mayland Community College (Spruce Pine, N.C.)
  • Simmons College of Kentucky (Louisville, Ky.)
  • University of South Carolina at Lancaster (Lancaster, S.C.)

Find junior and community college athletic programs in your state!

Supreme Court Decision Not Black & White

Monday, July 2nd, 2007

The Supreme Court’s 5-to-4 decision on the cases of Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education (KY) and Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District appeared, on their face, to spell the end of the use of race in school admissions and transfer decisions. But, did it?

The dissenting justices and proponents of affirmative action in school admissions decried the June 28th decision on the grounds that it effectively reversed the Court’s earlier decision in the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case, the case that established equality in education. Basically, this case allowed the use of race in school admissions, placement and allocation decisions as long as the use served the government’s interest, namely remedied past intentional discrimination.

In both the recent cases, schools in Seattle and Louisville, KY used race to determine which schools students could attend, to make transfer decisions, and as “tie-breakers” when they needed to make choices between White and Nonwhite students once schools were over-booked.

The Supreme Court found that the use of race in the schools’ admissions and transfer processes served neither government interest–since the Seattle schools had never been legally segregated and the Kentucky schools had had their court-ordered desegregation lifted in 2000. Further, the schools failed to demonstrate that their policies benefitted the students or improved the quality of education in any legally acceptable way; the policies, according to the court, amounted to “racial balancing”.

Chief Justice John G. Stephens Jr. wrote that such policies only “promote the notion of racial inferiority and the politics of racial division”.

In the end, the justices’ decision did not do make use of race as an admission criteria illegal in all secondary school admissions; schools may use race so long as the goal is narrowly defined and serve to remedy past intentional discrimination. Race may not be used as the sole criteria, and must be shown to markedly improve the quality of education at the school (as determined by more than higher test scores or mere racial diversity).

The Court’s decision also did not really impact the use of race in college admissions where the court acknowledges that it may be appropriate to use race in college admissions where the use can be shown to improve the quality of education, as long as it is part of a broader set of criteria designed to create that diversity.

Campus Tour Season Is Upon Us

Thursday, June 14th, 2007

School is out. What’s your plan? A little swimming? A summer fling? Lazy summer nights?

Skip it!

Use your summer to kick the tires at a few colleges. There’s no better time than summer to take a road trip to check out campuses you’ve only read about and seen in catalogs. It’s summer for college students too, so many of the campuses will be a bit deserted, but you’ll still be able to get a good “feel” for the campus, the dorms, the classrooms, libraries, some of the professors and the surrounding cities and towns.

During the school year, the admissions offices at every college offer student-led tours, weekend visits and course audits. Most of this stuff is not available after May 31 because the students who lead and facilitate the tours and overnight visits have gone home for the summer.

Don’t despair. Summer programs abound. Many colleges offer summer “preview” programs, or summer institutes and weekend workshops for high school students and other prospective undergrads. These programs are generally focused on particular segments of students–minority or female students, or students interested in engineering–and designed to introduce students in the community to which they might belong if they attend the college. They are also, of course, great recruiting tools: There is nothing more seductive than spending the night in a drafty old building named after a rich dead guy, eating nondescript food in a dining hall that reminds you of your elementary school (remember standing in line with your plastic tray, your applesauce and your half-pint carton of chocolate milk?), staying up and out all night with people you barely know but feel amazingly close to, wearing your PJ’s to class, falling asleep in the “stacks” of an architecturally-stunning old library, and finding yourself among the lucky few who scored a seat in the classroom of the best professor in your major.

I attended several of these summer programs during my sophomore, junior and senior years. They gave me an up-close and personal preview of life at the colleges I was considering applying to. I also met cool people who ultimately became my friends once when I enrolled in college. Needless to say, I highly recommend attending a few of them.

Excited? Good.

Now, the bad news: If you haven’t already applied, you may not be able to get into the program of your choice at this late date. And, most of the programs are not free. In fact, some of them are very expensive.

I know. I know. You think I got you all excited for nothing. But, that’s not so; there are still plenty of colleges still accepting applicants. While they may not be your top-choice schools, they can still offer you valuable insight into college life. They can show you what you don’t like, which is as important as knowing what you do like when choosing a college.

More good news: Many of the programs offer financial aid (Apply early to get the most consideration).

Here are a few:

Now, allow me to further redeem myself by telling you that not finding a summer program is not the end of the world, or the summer. You can build your own summer campus tour.

Here’s how:

  1. Make a list of the colleges you are thinking of applying to
  2. If you have more than 10, whittle it down (that’s way too many!)
  3. Rank the colleges based on how badly you want to attend them (1=”My Absolute First Choice”)
  4. Review your top 5, crossing out any schools that you cannot visit this summer (either because they are too far away and your car won’t make it or because you can’t afford a plane ticket). You don’t have to give up on these schools; we’re just narrowing this summer’s campus tour list.
  5. If all of your top 5 are too far away, choose others from your top 10.
  6. Try to visit 3-5 colleges this summer
  7. Complete the “Build-Your-Own Summer College Tour” Worksheet
  8. Grab your best friend or mom or dad and hit the road!

Case Western Reserve Gets a (Second) Life

Thursday, May 17th, 2007

Case Western Reserve U. on Second Life

Case Western Reserve has created a virtual campus in Second Life, a 3-D virtual world filled with avatars and advertisers trying to get a foothold just in case this thing really takes off. Case Western Reserve spent $30,000 in the hopes of attracting prospective students. So, how’s that workin’ out? So far, only 40 prospective students have dropped by.

Get more info on the Case Second Life Island and find out about campus visits, open houses and other online tours (Psst! This is better than the Second Life tour).

Check out the virtual tour!

New Scholarships, Internships and Other College Info Available at Everybodyelsesguidetocollege.com!

Tuesday, May 8th, 2007

Check out the latest scholarships, athletics, internships and other information for college-bound students at Everybodyelsesguidetocollege.com, a great online resource for all college-bound students.  Everybodyelsesguidetocollege.com also features  hundreds of scholarships, internships, grants and more for minority students.

Where the Boys Aren’t

Thursday, April 19th, 2007

An alarming trend is emerging on college campuses around the country.

Men are disappearing!

The number of men on college campuses has been on the decline since 1979.  Currently, the average college student body is 42% male and 58% female.  On campuses such as the University of San Francisco, the numbers are even more shocking; only 37% male!

To make matters worse, educators and researchers alike believe the trend will continue based on the fact that young girls perform better in both elementary and high school, are more likely to be a member of an honors society, more likely to be valedictorian, and more likely to be accepted into top-tier colleges.

Boys, on the other hand, appear to be getting the message that college is not cool.  Researchers speculate that the influence of sports and entertainment figures, many of whom skipped college and went on to become millionaires anyway, on young boys and men is to blame for fewer men choosing to attend college.

Other speculate that a lack of interest in scholarly subjects and parental expectations have also lead young men to opt out of college.

The influence of these and other factors on male college attendance is even greater in African-American and Hispanic communities; the ratio of women to men attending college is nearly 2 to 1!

Many sociologists are concerned about the societal implications of this imbalance.  Others are concerned that colleges will establish covert affirmative action programs to admit more male applicants than female applicants, despite their relative qualifications.  The latter fear is echoed by high-achieving young women and their parents.

Beyond Rankings: Do Colleges Really Make the Grade?

Thursday, April 19th, 2007

Building on President Bush’s No Child Left Behind law that put standardized testing into public K-12 schools, Education Secretary Margaret Spellings wants to make sure the billions of taxpayers’ dollars that support colleges and universities are well spent. More than that, she sees government as a protector of education “consumers.”

Spellings has proposed assessments for colleges.  These assessments would ensure that colleges were providing students a quality education, one that would not only lead to a degree, but also ensure that students had the skills needed to compete for jobs in the global economy.  Additionally, colleges failing to earn a certain score or meet a certain standard could be cut off from their life’s blood–federal financial aid.  Schools who consistently fail to meet standards would not be able to offer financial aid to students, potentially leading top students to attend rival colleges.

Currently, students and parents rely on magazine and web rankings of colleges to identify colleges to which they will apply.  These rankings are largely based on the schools’ reputations, features or benefits identified by the schools, and/or the votes of students and faculty; not on whether or not the students actually graduate, or whether they have the skills required to fill jobs in the local or global job market.  Spellings proposes to position assessment scores as competitors, or at least counterpoints, to magazine and web rankings.  All college assessment scores will be published on the web to allow students to compare them to those provided by other publishers.

While educators aren’t in love with rankings published by U.S. News & World Report (the publisher of the most influential rankings), they are equally leery of Spellings’ proposal of college assessments.  The contention appears to center on just how strict the standards might be, and the consequences of failure: Some colleges will go under, and/or be forced to turn away talented students from low-income families because they would not be able to offer financial aid.

Spellings insists that published assessment scores will create transparency and accountability.  Her goal appears to be two-fold:  Help students select colleges that actually prepare them for success, and ensure that taxpayers’ dollars are not wasted.

Negotiations begin again April 24, with the federal rules expected to take force by July 2008.Related Article

The Three R’s: Record Rejection Rates

Friday, April 6th, 2007

Top-tier colleges around the country are reporting record rejection rates.  Earlier this week, Columbia University (NY) revealed that only 8.9%, or 1,609, of the 18, 081 students who applied were admitted.  Harvard (MA) reported the second-lowest acceptance rate, accepting 2,058, or 9%, of 22,956.  And rounding out the Ivy-Leagued pack was Stanford University (CA) accepting 10.3%, or 2,456, students.

Those applying to top-tier, non-Ivy schools are also feeling the burn.  UCLA reported accepting only 20.6% of applicants; UC Berkeley accepted just 20.2%, and UC Davis accepted a relatively generous 41.3%.  Even smaller colleges are getting into the fray: Amherst College accepted only 17.5% of 6,668 applicants, and California Institute of Technology accepted only 16% of 3,595 applicants.

This trend is alarming to many students who have worked hard to max out their grade point averages and test scores, and pack their resumes with leadership and volunteer activities.  In past years these overachieving students would have been shoe-ins to the Ivy League.  Not so today.

Today, Harvard rejects applicants with perfect 800 scores on the SAT math exam (1,100 of them this year).  Yale rejected applicants with perfect 2,400 scores on the three-part SAT, and Princeton rejected thousands of students with 4.0 grade point averages.

College admissions officers at top-tier schools cite three factors driving down acceptance rates: (1) increased  numbers of high school graduates (up 4% over last year and expected to continue to climb); (2) more high school students are enrolling in college immediately after high school (more than 60%); and (3) the average college student applies to more colleges (2% of all students applied to 11 or more in 2006).

But, the news isn’t all bad.  Expectedly, the highest rejection rates belong to the Ivys and the most competitive, top-tier schools, but the other 2,500 four-year colleges and universities are holding steady at an average rejection rate of 30% (That’s a 70% acceptance rate!).

And, despite the rising competition and ego-bruising rejection rates, students should not give up on being admitted to top schools.  Students’ revised college admissions strategy must include developing and emphasizing the “something special” factor.  Perfect test scores and 4.0 grade point averages must be complemented by a demonstration of personal interest in an intended major or career, and an focus on accomplishment outside the classroom.  In plain language, admissions officers want to see that students are not just stacking their applications with prom committees, student government and school-sponsored volunteer work; they want to see that the student has taken a leadership role in organizations or activities in which they are interested, that the student has interests that they are so passionate about that they not only devote time and energy, but also win recognition.

The dreaded college essay moves back onto center stage too.  Cliche’ as it sounds, a great essay can help separate the overachievers from the super overachievers.  Students should use the essay to really emphasize who they are, their interests, what they done to further those interests and any recognition they’ve received for their efforts.

If that’s Strategy A, then Strategy B is to apply to less competitive schools.  While that may sound like giving up, it doesn’t have to be.  Advisors have been telling students to apply to “stretch”, “reach” and “safety” schools for years.  Strategy B simply asks that they apply to more  “reach” and “safety” schools, in addition to their “stretch” schools.  Strategy B is an opportunity to learn about smaller and more specialized schools that. while they may not be Ivys, are well-respected, and even noted, for certain majors or programs or in certain regions.

Students generally apply to the Ivys for the cache’ and the promise of more and better job opportunities upon graduation.  The truth is that studies have shown that there is no difference between the earnings of students who were accepted to Ivy League schools but attended other schools and those who attended Ivy League schools.  So, the cleverest of students can launch successful careers from even the most obscure campuses (Jack Welch attended UMass and the University of Illinois and Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard and never earned a college degree).

States, Schools to Require All HS Seniors to Apply to College

Monday, March 12th, 2007

Several states and individual high schools have begun working to pass bills that would require that all high school seniors complete at least one college application in order to graduate. Several schools in Pennsylvania, Texas, Maryland and Maine already require that seniors complete a college application, create portfolios and transition to college/career plans, and/or be accepted to a community college in order to graduate.

Recently, House Speaker Glenn Cummings (D-Portland) of Maine proposed a bill requiring every school in the state to impose the college application requirement.

Read the full story.